Talk:Shoot the chute

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Amusement Parks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Amusement parks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Amusement ParksWikipedia:WikiProject Amusement ParksTemplate:WikiProject Amusement Parksamusement park articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

"It is the first and currently the only water-based amusement park ride in the world to utilize an adjustable electromagnetic braking system to control the volume of the splash." - This may have been true in 2000, when "Perilous Plunge" was installed. Since then Mack Rides (Germany) alone installed five "SuperSplash" models - all of them feature adjustable electromagnetic brakes. I do not know about other manufacturers. 217.28.107.11 23:56, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vekoma uses magnetic brakes on the two Universal Jurassic Park rides, and magnetic brakes have recently been added to the Arrow-built Snake River Falls at Cedar Point.JlACEer (talk) 16:04, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Since the opening of Jurassic Park predates Perilous Plunge, I have removed the reference to it being the first.JlACEer (talk) 14:55, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Name Change

Although multiple Chutes do occur, typically the ride only involves one chute. Arrow Development, who brought back the modern-day version, and Hopkins, who has more of this type of ride than anyone else, both refer to these rides as Shoot The Chute (not plural, and no hyphens). Ride guides by Tim O'Brien and most trade publications also refer to the ride as Shoot The Chute. The text in the actual wiki article also uses "Shoot-The-Chute" (not plural). I would recommend that the name of this page be changed to Shoot The Chute (no hyphens, not plural).JlACEer (talk) 15:45, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would support the change. Is the "t" capitalized though?--Astros4477 (talk) 16:35, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'd support it also, however, the "t" probably shouldn't be captialised if we are talking about the general ride model. If we are talking about the specific model from Hopkins maybe it should be capitalised. Themeparkgc Talk 01:02, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

'Modern' and 'historical' titles?

I wonder if these should be changed? It's not clear where to put extant rides which are 'historical'. Is 'historical' intended to include only rides which are all defunct? It's not clear. In my case, I am wondering where to put this ride (the lower pictures, not the red one at the top!) It was built in 1926 and recently refurbished. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mark76uk (talk • contribs) 23:36, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To me the turning point is 1984, when Arrow built a fiberglass shoot the chute for the Louisiana Worlds Exposition (moved to AstroWorld in 1986). That started a revival with Intamin introducing its version in 1985 then Hopkins in 1986. From there they became theme park staples. Anything prior to 1984 should be historic, anything after should be modern, regardless of whether it is operating or defunct. I moved the SFGAd Shoot the Chutes over to modern.—JlACEer (talk) 03:49, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Shoot the Chute. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:42, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]